feature request for ibmtts module

[Trevor Saunders]

Hi,

I'm not very convinced that doing this would change the licencing issues
at all.

Trev
k

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:26:05AM -0500, Christopher Brannon wrote:
> Halim Sahin <halim.sahin at t-online.de> writes:
> 
> > BTW.: what's your opinion about the sd_ibmtts synth and it's support in
> > speechd?
> 
> Hi Halim,
> My personal opinion about IBMTTS is that it is a shining example of what
> can go wrong when software is proprietary.  It would be a fine synth if
> it were actively maintained, but it isn't.  It is abandonware.
> Nobody is around to fix the bugs.
> As for the SD support, it's there, and people are going to use it, I
> suppose.
> 
> Regarding your proposal regarding dlopening the library at run-time, that
> will not work on a 64-bit system, will it?  I don't think you can
> dynamically load 32-bit code into a 64-bit executable.
> 
> All the best,
> -- Chris



> _______________________________________________
> Speechd mailing list
> Speechd at lists.freebsoft.org
> http://lists.freebsoft.org/mailman/listinfo/speechd

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsoft.org/pipermail/speechd/attachments/20101021/1de815dd/attachment-0001.pgp>