feature request for ibmtts module
trev.saunders at gmail.com
Thu Oct 21 18:46:44 CEST 2010
I'm not very convinced that doing this would change the licencing issues
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:26:05AM -0500, Christopher Brannon wrote:
> Halim Sahin <halim.sahin at t-online.de> writes:
> > BTW.: what's your opinion about the sd_ibmtts synth and it's support in
> > speechd?
> Hi Halim,
> My personal opinion about IBMTTS is that it is a shining example of what
> can go wrong when software is proprietary. It would be a fine synth if
> it were actively maintained, but it isn't. It is abandonware.
> Nobody is around to fix the bugs.
> As for the SD support, it's there, and people are going to use it, I
> Regarding your proposal regarding dlopening the library at run-time, that
> will not work on a 64-bit system, will it? I don't think you can
> dynamically load 32-bit code into a 64-bit executable.
> All the best,
> -- Chris
> Speechd mailing list
> Speechd at lists.freebsoft.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Speechd