still trying to get flite working

[Stephen Kelly]

Alright!

I've got flite and speech-dispatcher installed.  BUT, when I start speech-dispatcher:
speech-dispatcher -s
I get this:
: error while loading shared libraries: libflite.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
: error while loading shared libraries: libflite.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
: error while loading shared libraries: libdotconf-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Both the files are in /usr/local/lib/.  I ran ldconfig.  Is there a way that I can move or link them so speech-dispatcher will find them?
Thanks so much,
Stephen



-----Original Message-----

> Date: Wed Jul 28 16:49:41 ADT 2004
> From: "Milan Zamazal" <pdm at zamazal.org>
> Subject: Re: still trying to get flite working
> To: "Stephen Kelly" <Stephen.Kelly at dal.ca>
>
> >>>>> "SK" == Stephen Kelly <Stephen.Kelly at Dal.Ca> writes:
> 
>     SK> The output of make gave hundreds of lines like this:
>     SK> cmu_us_kal16_diphone.c:129412: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
>     SK> ...as well as some normal looking stuff and NO errors.  What
>     SK> does that mean?
> 
> These are just C language warnings (unclean constructs in the flite
> sources), you can ignore them here.
> 
>     SK> I then tried speech dispatcher to see if it would compile:
>     SK> ./build.sh
>     SK> ./configure
>     SK> But the output of configure gave this:
>     SK> checking for flite_init in -lflite... no
>     SK> *** Required Flite libraries missing or instalation incomplete!
>     SK> See INSTALL .
> 
>     SK> I'm not sure what to do next and I am relatively inexperienced
>     SK> at this type of thing, learning a lot as I go.  Any guidance is
>     SK> much appreciated.
> 
> What you probably missed was to invoke `make install' after the flite
> compilation.  I'd also suggest to run `ldconfig' afterwards to make the
> dynamic linker aware about the newly installed shared libraries.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Milan Zamazal
> 
> -- 
> If we are going to start removing packages because of the quality of the
> software, wonderful.  I move to remove all traces of the travesty of editors,
> vi, from Debian, since obviously as editors they are less than alpha quality
> software.                                   -- Manoj Srivastava in debian-devel